- The National Mathematics Advisory Panel issued recommendations that called for more traditional approaches to math instruction (i.e. traditional algorithms, caution with calculator use, more practicing of skills, and increased rigor).
- Washington’s K-12 math standards were completely revamped, calling for more traditional content.
- For 20 years, mathematicians have criticized the reform math curricula widely used across Washington (and throughout Spokane Public Schools). These curricula also were hammered in Washington’s recent curricula assessments.
- Washington State’s Department of Education (OSPI) issued recommendations for K-8 math curricula that are based on the new standards. The curricula used in Spokane are not on the list. Expectations are that Spokane’s high school curriculum also will be rejected.
- Advocates have repeatedly asked school boards across the nation to replace reform math curricula with more traditional curricula.

You get the gist. Spokane needs to adopt more traditional math curricula. Waiting only prolongs the students’ agony. The district already has recommendations for K-8 math curricula that were vetted by people who support a traditional track. All the board has to do is adopt some of them. Now I can quote from the Feb. 11 meeting minutes, located at http://www.spokaneschools.org/Board/minutes/02-11-09.pdf .

**NEW BUSINESS**

Teaching and Learning Services

Middle School Math Update

Ms. Bridget Lewis, executive director for Teaching and Learning Services, introduced Ms. Gina Rye, middle school math coordinator, and Mr. Rick Biggerstaff, secondary math coordinator. … Ms. Lewis commented that the staff needs to dig deeper in terms of the grade 6 to 7 transition.

Ms. Lewis added that it is going to take multiple strategies such as standards-based grading, math labs, and professional learning in order to improve mathematics instruction.

**“…the staff needs to dig deeper in terms of the grade 6 to 7 transition.”**What does this mean? Does it mean to replace the math curriculum? If not, they can “dig” as deeply as they want; they’ll never reach the solution.

**“Ms. Lewis responded that the data … is not unique to Spokane.”**This statement is true, but it doesn’t mean an answer isn’t available. Indeed, it points to a national failure with reform math curricula.

**"(Ms. Lewis) said no one has the answer; however, the staff does know that they have to pay close attention to what is happening in the classroom.”**Actually, we have the answer, and it’s clear: Replace the curricula with more traditional approaches. For some inexplicable reason, district employees obstinately refuse to say so.

It’s true that staff members should “pay close attention to what is happening in the classroom.” If they were, they would notice that students aren’t learning sufficient mathematics.

**“(Ms. Lewis) pointed out that the data shows that Spokane has more students taking advanced placement math and all students are taking more mathematics.”**More students are indeed taking AP classes – please see http://betrayed-whyeducationisfailing.blogspot.com/2008/12/district-view-of-ap-classes-at-odds.html for proof that substantially more students also are failing to pass the AP exams.

I reject the statement that “all students are taking more mathematics.” Some might be taking more math

*classes*, but if the classes were effective, students would know more math than they do.

**“Dr. Stowell noted that grades 3 through 7 math scores are higher than the state average.”**So what? Spokane’s 2008 math WASL scores look like this:

**Grade Level Math**

3rd Grade - 75.2%

4th Grade - 60.7%

5th Grade - 69.2%

6th Grade - 55.9%

7th Grade - 52.4%

8th Grade - 49.5%

10th Grade - 45.9%

**“(Dr. Stowell said) in spite of not having all of the answers, the scores are moving in the right direction.”**District staff members do have the answers; they just refuse to acknowledge them. You tell me – do the 2008 math WASL scores look like they’re “moving in the right direction”?

**"(Dr. Stowell) stated that math and science summer camps and math coaches would help, but it is difficult to fill the open teaching spots.”**

**“Ms. Lewis added that it is going to take multiple strategies such as standards-based grading, math labs, and professional learning in order to improve mathematics instruction.” **

**“(Director Douthitt) conceded that the frustration is that no one has figured out how to solve the problem." **

**“Ms. Lewis said the team wants to look at this very straight forward and determine how to get at the hard questions.”**

*curriculum, the curriculum, the curriculum*! Replacing the reform curricula with more traditional approaches is what will improve mathematics instruction.

*Why won’t they say it?*

One begins to wonder if some of these people own stock in companies that publish reform curricula.

Folks, this is what is being done on your behalf. Director Jeff Bierman appears to be almost alone in the district in speaking out on behalf of a better approach. Please add your voice to his and/or vote with your feet. Quite literally, the children’s futures are at stake.

Please note: The information in this post is copyrighted. The proper citation is:

Rogers, L. (March, 2009). "District says no one knows how to fix math problem." Retrieved (date) from the Betrayed Web site: http://betrayed-whyeducationisfailing.blogspot.com/

## No comments:

## Post a Comment